Exam #5 Essay

1.) Compare Mao To Stalin in how they came to power?

--Both Mao and stalin came from around the same kinds of things. They both were soliders and were known for being soliders. That made them kind of the same type of person. Althought Mao came to power from more of the dicatorship way. He wanted sole power over anyone else.

2.) Compare Mao to Hitler in how they came to power?

--Hilter was more of the promise things to get power. Although he promoised things to lot of the people he never really came through. He did what he wanted and never really listened to what other people whated. When he would promise to do something to get power it would never happen. He just wanted to over power people. Mao was more of the dicatorship kind of person. He wanted everyone to want him to have some type of power. Thats why he got most of the people into the dicatorship. Mao wanted to over power people but not in the same way as Hilter.



3.) What are the signs of a buliding dicatorship?

--When one person wants power. It is like having one person making all the decitions over what they want there country to be like. Its like having a king, they have most power and what they say over rules everything else. Thats what most wanted. Thats because they wanted final say in everything that went.

Exam #4 Part 1

During the Russian Revolution there were alot of people who thought differently about where the money, land and everything else should be. some thought it should be evenly spread between all. Thats what the peasants thought. They thought that the land should belong to the people that work, most thought that the workers should get the benifits. During the war and anyother time they were the hardest workers, and they also worked more longer hours than most. With working that much and not even having any money to show for it, there would be alot of changes with the enonomic conditions. How the French Revolution enonomic conditions and the Russian Revolution compare is by how there are more social and political ups and downs than there were economic in the french revolution.


Rasputin was one of the bigger leaders in the Russian Revolution. He was concitered miracle worker because he could help people when doctors couldn't. He was a trusted friend to most. Althought people thought that he was having a affair with the royal wife. Thats why not alot of people liked him they always thought he was having an affair with the wife of the king. George Danton was a leader in the french revolation in a different way than Rasputin was. Geogrge was a president of France. He was the biggest force in the revolution for France.


Both the French and the Russian won the wars. There outcomes were the same, both sides won thats why it was called a revoluation. In the end of the Russian Revolution there wasn't any difference with the way that the land was and where the money would go. The money and land still belonged to the people with the highest power and the ones that were higher class. After the French Revolution the ending was still that the ruler was Danton and he still powered over eveyone.